Files
Hermes Agent ccc63d1e70 first commit
2026-05-10 13:52:46 +08:00

13 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

name, description, version, author, license, metadata
name description version author license metadata
writing-plans Write implementation plans: bite-sized tasks, paths, code. 1.1.0 Hermes Agent (adapted from obra/superpowers) MIT
hermes
tags related_skills
planning
design
implementation
workflow
documentation
subagent-driven-development
test-driven-development
requesting-code-review

Writing Implementation Plans

Overview

Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the implementer has zero context for the codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need: which files to touch, complete code, testing commands, docs to check, how to verify. Give them bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.

Assume the implementer is a skilled developer but knows almost nothing about the toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.

Core principle: A good plan makes implementation obvious. If someone has to guess, the plan is incomplete.

When to Use

Always use before:

  • Implementing multi-step features
  • Breaking down complex requirements
  • Delegating to subagents via subagent-driven-development

Don't skip when:

  • Feature seems simple (assumptions cause bugs)
  • You plan to implement it yourself (future you needs guidance)
  • Working alone (documentation matters)

Bite-Sized Task Granularity

Each task = 2-5 minutes of focused work.

Every step is one action:

  • "Write the failing test" — step
  • "Run it to make sure it fails" — step
  • "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" — step
  • "Run the tests and make sure they pass" — step
  • "Commit" — step

Too big:

### Task 1: Build authentication system
[50 lines of code across 5 files]

Right size:

### Task 1: Create User model with email field
[10 lines, 1 file]

### Task 2: Add password hash field to User
[8 lines, 1 file]

### Task 3: Create password hashing utility
[15 lines, 1 file]

Plan Document Structure

Header (Required)

Every plan MUST start with:

# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan

> **For Hermes:** Use subagent-driven-development skill to implement this plan task-by-task.

**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]

**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]

**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]

---

Task Structure

Each task follows this format:

### Task N: [Descriptive Name]

**Objective:** What this task accomplishes (one sentence)

**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/new_file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:45-67` (line numbers if known)
- Test: `tests/path/to/test_file.py`

**Step 1: Write failing test**

```python
def test_specific_behavior():
    result = function(input)
    assert result == expected
```

**Step 2: Run test to verify failure**

Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_specific_behavior -v`
Expected: FAIL — "function not defined"

**Step 3: Write minimal implementation**

```python
def function(input):
    return expected
```

**Step 4: Run test to verify pass**

Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_specific_behavior -v`
Expected: PASS

**Step 5: Commit**

```bash
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
```

Writing Process

Step 1: Understand Requirements

Read and understand:

  • Feature requirements
  • Design documents or user description
  • Acceptance criteria
  • Constraints

Step 2: Explore the Codebase

Use Hermes tools to understand the project:

# Understand project structure
search_files("*.py", target="files", path="src/")

# Look at similar features
search_files("similar_pattern", path="src/", file_glob="*.py")

# Check existing tests
search_files("*.py", target="files", path="tests/")

# Read key files
read_file("src/app.py")

Step 3: Design Approach

Decide:

  • Architecture pattern
  • File organization
  • Dependencies needed
  • Testing strategy

Step 4: Write Tasks

Create tasks in order:

  1. Setup/infrastructure
  2. Core functionality (TDD for each)
  3. Edge cases
  4. Integration
  5. Cleanup/documentation

Step 5: Add Complete Details

For each task, include:

  • Exact file paths (not "the config file" but src/config/settings.py)
  • Complete code examples (not "add validation" but the actual code)
  • Exact commands with expected output
  • Verification steps that prove the task works

Step 6: Review the Plan

Check:

  • Tasks are sequential and logical
  • Each task is bite-sized (2-5 min)
  • File paths are exact
  • Code examples are complete (copy-pasteable)
  • Commands are exact with expected output
  • No missing context
  • DRY, YAGNI, TDD principles applied

Step 7: Save the Plan

mkdir -p docs/plans
# Save plan to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-feature-name.md
git add docs/plans/
git commit -m "docs: add implementation plan for [feature]"

Principles

DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)

Bad: Copy-paste validation in 3 places Good: Extract validation function, use everywhere

YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It)

Bad: Add "flexibility" for future requirements Good: Implement only what's needed now

# Bad — YAGNI violation
class User:
    def __init__(self, name, email):
        self.name = name
        self.email = email
        self.preferences = {}  # Not needed yet!
        self.metadata = {}     # Not needed yet!

# Good — YAGNI
class User:
    def __init__(self, name, email):
        self.name = name
        self.email = email

TDD (Test-Driven Development)

Every task that produces code should include the full TDD cycle:

  1. Write failing test
  2. Run to verify failure
  3. Write minimal code
  4. Run to verify pass

See test-driven-development skill for details.

Frequent Commits

Commit after every task:

git add [files]
git commit -m "type: description"

Common Mistakes

Vague Tasks

Bad: "Add authentication" Good: "Create User model with email and password_hash fields"

Incomplete Code

Bad: "Step 1: Add validation function" Good: "Step 1: Add validation function" followed by the complete function code

Missing Verification

Bad: "Step 3: Test it works" Good: "Step 3: Run pytest tests/test_auth.py -v, expected: 3 passed"

Missing File Paths

Bad: "Create the model file" Good: "Create: src/models/user.py"

Execution Handoff

After saving the plan, offer the execution approach:

"Plan complete and saved. Ready to execute using subagent-driven-development — I'll dispatch a fresh subagent per task with two-stage review (spec compliance then code quality). Shall I proceed?"

When executing, use the subagent-driven-development skill:

  • Fresh delegate_task per task with full context
  • Spec compliance review after each task
  • Code quality review after spec passes
  • Proceed only when both reviews approve

Remember

Bite-sized tasks (2-5 min each)
Exact file paths
Complete code (copy-pasteable)
Exact commands with expected output
Verification steps
DRY, YAGNI, TDD
Frequent commits

A good plan makes implementation obvious.

中文计划模板

计划头部

# [功能名称] 实现计划

> **Hermes 使用说明:** 使用 subagent-driven-development 技能逐个任务执行此计划。

**目标:** [一句话描述要构建什么]

**架构:** [2-3 句话描述技术方案]

**技术栈:** [关键技术/库]

**预计时间:** [总时间估算]

---

任务结构

### 任务 N: [描述性名称]

**目标:** 此任务要完成什么(一句话)

**文件:**
- 创建:`exact/path/to/new_file.py`
- 修改:`exact/path/to/existing.py:45-67`(如果知道行号)
- 测试:`tests/path/to/test_file.py`

**步骤 1: 编写失败测试**

```python
def test_specific_behavior():
    result = function(input)
    assert result == expected

步骤 2: 运行测试验证失败

运行:pytest tests/path/test.py::test_specific_behavior -v 预期FAIL — "function not defined"

步骤 3: 编写最小实现

def function(input):
    return expected

步骤 4: 运行测试验证通过

运行:pytest tests/path/test.py::test_specific_behavior -v 预期PASS

步骤 5: 提交

git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: 添加特定功能"

### 任务粒度示例

**太粗:**
```markdown
### 任务 1: 构建认证系统
[50 行代码,跨越 5 个文件]

合适:

### 任务 1: 创建用户模型,包含邮箱字段
[10 行1 个文件]

### 任务 2: 为用户添加密码哈希字段
[8 行1 个文件]

### 任务 3: 创建密码哈希工具函数
[15 行1 个文件]

中文计划示例

# 用户认证功能实现计划

> **Hermes 使用说明:** 使用 subagent-driven-development 技能逐个任务执行此计划。

**目标:** 实现用户注册、登录、JWT 令牌生成的完整认证系统

**架构:** 使用 Flask + SQLAlchemy + bcrypt遵循 RESTful 设计

**技术栈:** Python 3.11, Flask 2.3.2, SQLAlchemy 2.0, bcrypt 4.0, PyJWT 2.8

**预计时间:** 4 小时

---

### 任务 1: 创建用户模型

**目标:** 创建 User 模型,包含邮箱和密码哈希字段

**文件:**
- 创建:`src/models/user.py`
- 测试:`tests/models/test_user.py`

**步骤 1: 编写失败测试**

```python
def test_user_creation():
    user = User(email="test@example.com", password_hash="hashed")
    assert user.email == "test@example.com"
    assert user.password_hash == "hashed"

步骤 2: 运行测试验证失败

运行:pytest tests/models/test_user.py -v 预期FAIL — "cannot import name 'User'"

步骤 3: 编写最小实现

class User:
    def __init__(self, email, password_hash):
        self.email = email
        self.password_hash = password_hash

步骤 4: 运行测试验证通过

运行:pytest tests/models/test_user.py -v 预期PASS

步骤 5: 提交

git add src/models/user.py tests/models/test_user.py
git commit -m "feat: 创建用户模型"

任务 2: 添加密码哈希功能

目标: 实现密码哈希和验证功能

文件:

  • 创建:src/utils/password.py
  • 测试:tests/utils/test_password.py

步骤 1: 编写失败测试

def test_hash_password():
    hashed = hash_password("password123")
    assert hashed != "password123"
    assert verify_password("password123", hashed) is True
    assert verify_password("wrong", hashed) is False

步骤 2: 运行测试验证失败

运行:pytest tests/utils/test_password.py -v 预期FAIL — "cannot import name 'hash_password'"

步骤 3: 编写最小实现

import bcrypt

def hash_password(password):
    return bcrypt.hashpw(password.encode(), bcrypt.gensalt()).decode()

def verify_password(password, hashed):
    return bcrypt.checkpw(password.encode(), hashed.encode())

步骤 4: 运行测试验证通过

运行:pytest tests/utils/test_password.py -v 预期PASS

步骤 5: 提交

git add src/utils/password.py tests/utils/test_password.py
git commit -m "feat: 添加密码哈希功能"

任务 3: 创建注册端点

目标: 实现用户注册 API

文件:

  • 创建:src/routes/auth.py
  • 测试:tests/routes/test_auth.py

步骤 1: 编写失败测试

def test_register(client):
    response = client.post('/api/register', json={
        'email': 'test@example.com',
        'password': 'password123'
    })
    assert response.status_code == 201
    assert 'user' in response.json

步骤 2: 运行测试验证失败

运行:pytest tests/routes/test_auth.py::test_register -v 预期FAIL — "404 Not Found"

步骤 3: 编写最小实现

from flask import Blueprint, request, jsonify

auth_bp = Blueprint('auth', __name__)

@auth_bp.route('/api/register', methods=['POST'])
def register():
    data = request.json
    # TODO: 实现注册逻辑
    return jsonify({'user': {'email': data['email']}}), 201

步骤 4: 运行测试验证通过

运行:pytest tests/routes/test_auth.py::test_register -v 预期PASS

步骤 5: 提交

git add src/routes/auth.py tests/routes/test_auth.py
git commit -m "feat: 创建注册端点"


### 计划审查清单

- [ ] 任务是否按逻辑顺序排列?
- [ ] 每个任务是否足够小2-5 分钟)?
- [ ] 文件路径是否精确?
- [ ] 代码示例是否完整(可直接复制)?
- [ ] 命令是否精确,包含预期输出?
- [ ] 是否包含验证步骤?
- [ ] 是否应用了 DRY、YAGNI、TDD 原则?
- [ ] 是否包含中文注释和文档?