13 KiB
name, description, version, author, license, metadata
| name | description | version | author | license | metadata | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| writing-plans | Write implementation plans: bite-sized tasks, paths, code. | 1.1.0 | Hermes Agent (adapted from obra/superpowers) | MIT |
|
Writing Implementation Plans
Overview
Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the implementer has zero context for the codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need: which files to touch, complete code, testing commands, docs to check, how to verify. Give them bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
Assume the implementer is a skilled developer but knows almost nothing about the toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.
Core principle: A good plan makes implementation obvious. If someone has to guess, the plan is incomplete.
When to Use
Always use before:
- Implementing multi-step features
- Breaking down complex requirements
- Delegating to subagents via subagent-driven-development
Don't skip when:
- Feature seems simple (assumptions cause bugs)
- You plan to implement it yourself (future you needs guidance)
- Working alone (documentation matters)
Bite-Sized Task Granularity
Each task = 2-5 minutes of focused work.
Every step is one action:
- "Write the failing test" — step
- "Run it to make sure it fails" — step
- "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" — step
- "Run the tests and make sure they pass" — step
- "Commit" — step
Too big:
### Task 1: Build authentication system
[50 lines of code across 5 files]
Right size:
### Task 1: Create User model with email field
[10 lines, 1 file]
### Task 2: Add password hash field to User
[8 lines, 1 file]
### Task 3: Create password hashing utility
[15 lines, 1 file]
Plan Document Structure
Header (Required)
Every plan MUST start with:
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
> **For Hermes:** Use subagent-driven-development skill to implement this plan task-by-task.
**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]
**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]
**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]
---
Task Structure
Each task follows this format:
### Task N: [Descriptive Name]
**Objective:** What this task accomplishes (one sentence)
**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/new_file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:45-67` (line numbers if known)
- Test: `tests/path/to/test_file.py`
**Step 1: Write failing test**
```python
def test_specific_behavior():
result = function(input)
assert result == expected
```
**Step 2: Run test to verify failure**
Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_specific_behavior -v`
Expected: FAIL — "function not defined"
**Step 3: Write minimal implementation**
```python
def function(input):
return expected
```
**Step 4: Run test to verify pass**
Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_specific_behavior -v`
Expected: PASS
**Step 5: Commit**
```bash
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
```
Writing Process
Step 1: Understand Requirements
Read and understand:
- Feature requirements
- Design documents or user description
- Acceptance criteria
- Constraints
Step 2: Explore the Codebase
Use Hermes tools to understand the project:
# Understand project structure
search_files("*.py", target="files", path="src/")
# Look at similar features
search_files("similar_pattern", path="src/", file_glob="*.py")
# Check existing tests
search_files("*.py", target="files", path="tests/")
# Read key files
read_file("src/app.py")
Step 3: Design Approach
Decide:
- Architecture pattern
- File organization
- Dependencies needed
- Testing strategy
Step 4: Write Tasks
Create tasks in order:
- Setup/infrastructure
- Core functionality (TDD for each)
- Edge cases
- Integration
- Cleanup/documentation
Step 5: Add Complete Details
For each task, include:
- Exact file paths (not "the config file" but
src/config/settings.py) - Complete code examples (not "add validation" but the actual code)
- Exact commands with expected output
- Verification steps that prove the task works
Step 6: Review the Plan
Check:
- Tasks are sequential and logical
- Each task is bite-sized (2-5 min)
- File paths are exact
- Code examples are complete (copy-pasteable)
- Commands are exact with expected output
- No missing context
- DRY, YAGNI, TDD principles applied
Step 7: Save the Plan
mkdir -p docs/plans
# Save plan to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-feature-name.md
git add docs/plans/
git commit -m "docs: add implementation plan for [feature]"
Principles
DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)
Bad: Copy-paste validation in 3 places Good: Extract validation function, use everywhere
YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It)
Bad: Add "flexibility" for future requirements Good: Implement only what's needed now
# Bad — YAGNI violation
class User:
def __init__(self, name, email):
self.name = name
self.email = email
self.preferences = {} # Not needed yet!
self.metadata = {} # Not needed yet!
# Good — YAGNI
class User:
def __init__(self, name, email):
self.name = name
self.email = email
TDD (Test-Driven Development)
Every task that produces code should include the full TDD cycle:
- Write failing test
- Run to verify failure
- Write minimal code
- Run to verify pass
See test-driven-development skill for details.
Frequent Commits
Commit after every task:
git add [files]
git commit -m "type: description"
Common Mistakes
Vague Tasks
Bad: "Add authentication" Good: "Create User model with email and password_hash fields"
Incomplete Code
Bad: "Step 1: Add validation function" Good: "Step 1: Add validation function" followed by the complete function code
Missing Verification
Bad: "Step 3: Test it works"
Good: "Step 3: Run pytest tests/test_auth.py -v, expected: 3 passed"
Missing File Paths
Bad: "Create the model file"
Good: "Create: src/models/user.py"
Execution Handoff
After saving the plan, offer the execution approach:
"Plan complete and saved. Ready to execute using subagent-driven-development — I'll dispatch a fresh subagent per task with two-stage review (spec compliance then code quality). Shall I proceed?"
When executing, use the subagent-driven-development skill:
- Fresh
delegate_taskper task with full context - Spec compliance review after each task
- Code quality review after spec passes
- Proceed only when both reviews approve
Remember
Bite-sized tasks (2-5 min each)
Exact file paths
Complete code (copy-pasteable)
Exact commands with expected output
Verification steps
DRY, YAGNI, TDD
Frequent commits
A good plan makes implementation obvious.
中文计划模板
计划头部
# [功能名称] 实现计划
> **Hermes 使用说明:** 使用 subagent-driven-development 技能逐个任务执行此计划。
**目标:** [一句话描述要构建什么]
**架构:** [2-3 句话描述技术方案]
**技术栈:** [关键技术/库]
**预计时间:** [总时间估算]
---
任务结构
### 任务 N: [描述性名称]
**目标:** 此任务要完成什么(一句话)
**文件:**
- 创建:`exact/path/to/new_file.py`
- 修改:`exact/path/to/existing.py:45-67`(如果知道行号)
- 测试:`tests/path/to/test_file.py`
**步骤 1: 编写失败测试**
```python
def test_specific_behavior():
result = function(input)
assert result == expected
步骤 2: 运行测试验证失败
运行:pytest tests/path/test.py::test_specific_behavior -v
预期:FAIL — "function not defined"
步骤 3: 编写最小实现
def function(input):
return expected
步骤 4: 运行测试验证通过
运行:pytest tests/path/test.py::test_specific_behavior -v
预期:PASS
步骤 5: 提交
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: 添加特定功能"
### 任务粒度示例
**太粗:**
```markdown
### 任务 1: 构建认证系统
[50 行代码,跨越 5 个文件]
合适:
### 任务 1: 创建用户模型,包含邮箱字段
[10 行,1 个文件]
### 任务 2: 为用户添加密码哈希字段
[8 行,1 个文件]
### 任务 3: 创建密码哈希工具函数
[15 行,1 个文件]
中文计划示例
# 用户认证功能实现计划
> **Hermes 使用说明:** 使用 subagent-driven-development 技能逐个任务执行此计划。
**目标:** 实现用户注册、登录、JWT 令牌生成的完整认证系统
**架构:** 使用 Flask + SQLAlchemy + bcrypt,遵循 RESTful 设计
**技术栈:** Python 3.11, Flask 2.3.2, SQLAlchemy 2.0, bcrypt 4.0, PyJWT 2.8
**预计时间:** 4 小时
---
### 任务 1: 创建用户模型
**目标:** 创建 User 模型,包含邮箱和密码哈希字段
**文件:**
- 创建:`src/models/user.py`
- 测试:`tests/models/test_user.py`
**步骤 1: 编写失败测试**
```python
def test_user_creation():
user = User(email="test@example.com", password_hash="hashed")
assert user.email == "test@example.com"
assert user.password_hash == "hashed"
步骤 2: 运行测试验证失败
运行:pytest tests/models/test_user.py -v
预期:FAIL — "cannot import name 'User'"
步骤 3: 编写最小实现
class User:
def __init__(self, email, password_hash):
self.email = email
self.password_hash = password_hash
步骤 4: 运行测试验证通过
运行:pytest tests/models/test_user.py -v
预期:PASS
步骤 5: 提交
git add src/models/user.py tests/models/test_user.py
git commit -m "feat: 创建用户模型"
任务 2: 添加密码哈希功能
目标: 实现密码哈希和验证功能
文件:
- 创建:
src/utils/password.py - 测试:
tests/utils/test_password.py
步骤 1: 编写失败测试
def test_hash_password():
hashed = hash_password("password123")
assert hashed != "password123"
assert verify_password("password123", hashed) is True
assert verify_password("wrong", hashed) is False
步骤 2: 运行测试验证失败
运行:pytest tests/utils/test_password.py -v
预期:FAIL — "cannot import name 'hash_password'"
步骤 3: 编写最小实现
import bcrypt
def hash_password(password):
return bcrypt.hashpw(password.encode(), bcrypt.gensalt()).decode()
def verify_password(password, hashed):
return bcrypt.checkpw(password.encode(), hashed.encode())
步骤 4: 运行测试验证通过
运行:pytest tests/utils/test_password.py -v
预期:PASS
步骤 5: 提交
git add src/utils/password.py tests/utils/test_password.py
git commit -m "feat: 添加密码哈希功能"
任务 3: 创建注册端点
目标: 实现用户注册 API
文件:
- 创建:
src/routes/auth.py - 测试:
tests/routes/test_auth.py
步骤 1: 编写失败测试
def test_register(client):
response = client.post('/api/register', json={
'email': 'test@example.com',
'password': 'password123'
})
assert response.status_code == 201
assert 'user' in response.json
步骤 2: 运行测试验证失败
运行:pytest tests/routes/test_auth.py::test_register -v
预期:FAIL — "404 Not Found"
步骤 3: 编写最小实现
from flask import Blueprint, request, jsonify
auth_bp = Blueprint('auth', __name__)
@auth_bp.route('/api/register', methods=['POST'])
def register():
data = request.json
# TODO: 实现注册逻辑
return jsonify({'user': {'email': data['email']}}), 201
步骤 4: 运行测试验证通过
运行:pytest tests/routes/test_auth.py::test_register -v
预期:PASS
步骤 5: 提交
git add src/routes/auth.py tests/routes/test_auth.py
git commit -m "feat: 创建注册端点"
### 计划审查清单
- [ ] 任务是否按逻辑顺序排列?
- [ ] 每个任务是否足够小(2-5 分钟)?
- [ ] 文件路径是否精确?
- [ ] 代码示例是否完整(可直接复制)?
- [ ] 命令是否精确,包含预期输出?
- [ ] 是否包含验证步骤?
- [ ] 是否应用了 DRY、YAGNI、TDD 原则?
- [ ] 是否包含中文注释和文档?